<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Scrape Rate – A New Link Metric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate</link>
	<description>Link Building Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-11603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Jon,

Here is how I look at it.  I suppose that anytime you are given the opportunity to publish somewhere that you know your post is going to earn a couple dozen backlinks instantaneously (whether from scraped content or not) then you should definitely take advantage of it.    I just question how many opportunities (on different domains) you are going to get to do that.

Your idea of inventing a tool to measure the metric is a creative idea…...I tip my hat to you.  I just think that if someone is actually going to take the time to analyze whether or not they are going to submit a guest blog based on that particular metric then that person is guilty of analysis paralysis.

Why bother measuring it at all?   If you have the opportunity to publish a guest blog post at a decent site that shares your same target audience, why in the hell would you pass it up?  You would be crazy to pass it up even if the scrape rate was zero.

And, if you are guest blogging primarily for links, there are easy ways you can juice up a less juicy post on someone else’s website without crossing any black hat lines.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jon,</p>
<p>Here is how I look at it.  I suppose that anytime you are given the opportunity to publish somewhere that you know your post is going to earn a couple dozen backlinks instantaneously (whether from scraped content or not) then you should definitely take advantage of it.    I just question how many opportunities (on different domains) you are going to get to do that.</p>
<p>Your idea of inventing a tool to measure the metric is a creative idea…&#8230;I tip my hat to you.  I just think that if someone is actually going to take the time to analyze whether or not they are going to submit a guest blog based on that particular metric then that person is guilty of analysis paralysis.</p>
<p>Why bother measuring it at all?   If you have the opportunity to publish a guest blog post at a decent site that shares your same target audience, why in the hell would you pass it up?  You would be crazy to pass it up even if the scrape rate was zero.</p>
<p>And, if you are guest blogging primarily for links, there are easy ways you can juice up a less juicy post on someone else’s website without crossing any black hat lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cooper</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment Lovett! I&#039;m saying that they pass minimum value, but when found in great numbers, they have the ability to pass some value. Why? Because if your content is being scraped by 80 different sites just days after it was published, it&#039;s telling Google that it&#039;s content worth scraping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Lovett! I&#8217;m saying that they pass minimum value, but when found in great numbers, they have the ability to pass some value. Why? Because if your content is being scraped by 80 different sites just days after it was published, it&#8217;s telling Google that it&#8217;s content worth scraping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovett</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8336</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Jon,

Are you suggesting that links from duplicate content pass value and help rankings? That sounds like SEO back in 2008 when article marketing was thriving.   The 1-2 week delay in the rankings may not relate to the links you got from the scrapers at all. This is just speculation but if that really works, Google sucks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>Are you suggesting that links from duplicate content pass value and help rankings? That sounds like SEO back in 2008 when article marketing was thriving.   The 1-2 week delay in the rankings may not relate to the links you got from the scrapers at all. This is just speculation but if that really works, Google sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check this out, Jon, and let me know what you think:

http://myseocommunity.com/blog/myseocommunity/scraped-content-link-building/

PS Your help to promote the post will be greatly appreciated!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out, Jon, and let me know what you think:</p>
<p><a href="http://myseocommunity.com/blog/myseocommunity/scraped-content-link-building/" rel="nofollow">http://myseocommunity.com/blog/myseocommunity/scraped-content-link-building/</a></p>
<p>PS Your help to promote the post will be greatly appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cooper</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8265</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s awesome Ana! It&#039;s such a raw idea, so I can&#039;t wait to see how some of the great bloggers in our industry like you utilize this.

Thanks for stopping by! Really pumped you left a comment :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awesome Ana! It&#8217;s such a raw idea, so I can&#8217;t wait to see how some of the great bloggers in our industry like you utilize this.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by! Really pumped you left a comment <img src='http://pointblankseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8248</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Definitely brilliant, Jon.

Now my brain is churning trying to figure out how to improve the scrape rate for my blog! lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely brilliant, Jon.</p>
<p>Now my brain is churning trying to figure out how to improve the scrape rate for my blog! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin gallagher</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8212</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI Jon,

Yeah that would make sense to me. I wasn&#039;t dissing your theory ( although it does warrant more research) I was just trying to understand the relationship between that and article marketing. As you don&#039;t need to be aaron wall to work out that Article marketing is as dead as disco.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Jon,</p>
<p>Yeah that would make sense to me. I wasn&#8217;t dissing your theory ( although it does warrant more research) I was just trying to understand the relationship between that and article marketing. As you don&#8217;t need to be aaron wall to work out that Article marketing is as dead as disco.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Cooper</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we can agree to disagree, but I&#039;ve personally seen results from this. What makes this different from article marketing is that the sites scraping it are usually both relevant and contain less duplicate content. For example, an article directory is usually marked as total crap by Google, because all of its content is usually duplicate or spun. But a stand alone site that publishes its own unique content and an-every-once-in-a-while scraped piece of content usually holds more value (sorry for the unforgivable amount of dashes).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can agree to disagree, but I&#8217;ve personally seen results from this. What makes this different from article marketing is that the sites scraping it are usually both relevant and contain less duplicate content. For example, an article directory is usually marked as total crap by Google, because all of its content is usually duplicate or spun. But a stand alone site that publishes its own unique content and an-every-once-in-a-while scraped piece of content usually holds more value (sorry for the unforgivable amount of dashes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin gallagher</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8204</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[article marketing and spun article isn&#039;t the best way to do seo though is it? So you can keep that tactic thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>article marketing and spun article isn&#8217;t the best way to do seo though is it? So you can keep that tactic thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://pointblankseo.com/scrape-rate/comment-page-1#comment-8196</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointblankseo.com/?p=1446#comment-8196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This works. Period.

Though - it&#039;s not really any different then just loading up something like article marketing robot and blasting out 200 article copies with your links in it. (Save the authority from the original post) The value of those sites and the value of scraper sites are essentially the same.

Also - the people saying links from scraped sites and spun content links are now dead and &quot;we aren&#039;t in 2007&quot; - you&#039;re hilarious. Please keep telling people this doesn&#039;t work anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works. Period.</p>
<p>Though &#8211; it&#8217;s not really any different then just loading up something like article marketing robot and blasting out 200 article copies with your links in it. (Save the authority from the original post) The value of those sites and the value of scraper sites are essentially the same.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; the people saying links from scraped sites and spun content links are now dead and &#8220;we aren&#8217;t in 2007&#8243; &#8211; you&#8217;re hilarious. Please keep telling people this doesn&#8217;t work anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
