What To Do After the Guest Blogging Apocalypse

by Jon Cooper
189 Flares 189 Flares ×

So, the news hit, and before I go any further, I love Cyrus Shepard’s tweet:

So let’s talk about guest blogging…

The funny thing is, for a lot of you higher quality SEOs and agencies who have been doing higher quality content placement, you really don’t have as much to worry about as you think. And that’s because you need perspective on what’s really been going on under the cover of the title “guest blogging”.

I’m talking about any of the service providers you can easily find when you Google “guest blogging service” or “guest posting service”. If you saw what’s being cranked out by those companies, and how well it’s actually been working, you’ll know that Google isn’t going after that small business with a few guest posts over the last year or two. What those service providers are doing is what’s really being targeted in the impending update hinted at by Mr. Cutts.

So again, with that said, higher quality stuff isn’t going to be targeted as badly as you might. In my opinion, it’s the obvious things that are going to be attacked:

1. Blogs that have the majority of their posts written by guests.
2. Blogs with “guest blogging”, “guest post”, “guest author”, etc. category & tag pages that are more than a few pages big.
3. Blogs that accept guest posts that may not be as frequently posted, but have other obvious signs of low quality.

And for those of you who have done just a few guest posts in the past, mediocre or not, you really don’t have much to worry about if they’re in small numbers. The reason is because you need to understand the difference between link devaluations and link penalties.

A link devaluation is when the value of an individual link either is significantly decreased or goes away altogether (we honestly don’t know). That’s why all the high quality sites that are linked to in a lot of guest posts used to disguise the client/target site are not going to be hit.

It’s only when there’s an unusual amount of link devaluations for a specified domain when you have the possible problem of a penalty. Now, in this instance, a couple things need to be taken into account:

1. The amount deemed to be “unusual” isn’t a set number, but most likely some percentage based on the total number of links to the domain. That’s why i.e. SearchEngineLand.com can get away with having 100 devalued guest blogging links, while for JoeShmoPlumbing.com, having that many questionable links will set off red flags to Google more easily.

2. If Google can deem undoubtedly that a link is, in fact, violating their guidelines (i.e. an obvious guest post), you can only guess that the amount deemed to be “unusual” is usually less since it’s more evident it’s a link scheme of some kind.

I want to reiterate that, as with most things in SEO, this is speculative. I came to these conclusions based off various SEOs I’ve talked to and articles I’ve read. I in no means know all the answers; these conclusions were just drawn from my own reasoning.

Moving on… what’s next for link builders?

Now that a specific tactic like guest blogging has had a falling out, and because I’m surprisingly on top of the news from a blogging perspective, you need to understand one broad, strategic approach that will help you avoid penalties in the future.

Always use a blended approach when building links.

Seriously. If you ever find yourself using only 2 or 3 tactics for your entire approach, even if you feel that they’re completely white hat, you’re setting yourself up for the possibility of failure.

Why is this? Well, let’s take a look at the landscape 3 years ago. Much spammier stuff was happening, and at the time, guest blogging was hailed as a high quality, white hat tactic to garner links. If you read Matt’s post (linked at the beginning of this post), he even mentions this.

But, as with any tactic, it only takes a few dozen spammers to beat the hell out of it, and evangelize it until there’s nothing “high quality” about it.

So if you use a blended approach, you don’t have to worry about this happening, because the worst that will happen is that those links are simply devalued.

I’m not saying to go out and do a lot of grey hat things in moderation, I’m saying that regardless of what you do, if it’s a significant part of your link strategy, you’re allowing yourself to be put into a position that could result in a penalty. Even if you don’t get a penalty and the links are simply only devalued, if you did rely heavily on those links to rank, your rankings will tank. Sure, you can just build new ones that revive those rankings, but you’ve not only lost time & ground on your competitors, but chances are you’re at a much higher risk moving forward if you weren’t already penalized.

So Jon, which tactics should I use next?

If you’re asking this question, then I highly suggest you do one key thing before you even think about going after any publicized tactics. I’m not trying to beat a dead horse here; I have a point, so just bare with me:

Create a high quality site first, so you’ve got leverage with Google if anything goes sour.

This goes back to Cyrus Shepard’s tweet at the beginning (ironically). There’s a good chance that a lot of you might step somewhere near that imaginary border of what Google says is OK and what’s not down the line, not because you try to, but because Google is unpredictable. So be prepared for this.

I honestly believe that moving forward, at least to some extent, you’re going to see Google being more lenient with some sites over others based on the quality of the site. If you’re by leaps & bounds the best result in a given space, and if you get tied up with a possible penalty over some ticky-tacky link scheme interpretation (i.e. not cloaking, doorway pages, sneaky redirects, etc.), I believe you’re going to have a higher chance of either avoiding the penalty or getting out of it than a site that’s mediocre at best.

So try and be the result that they’d be embarrassed not to show (someone tweeted this, sorry for not giving attribution).

Now, if you’re pulling your hair and begging me for some tactics… I’ve already published a big list. Just make sure that when you go after any of these, you’re not thinking, “how can I make this the bread & butter of my link development campaigns” but rather “how can I sprinkle this in to my link development strategy”.


This post was written by...

Jon Cooper – who has written 119 posts on Point Blank SEO.

Jon Cooper+ is an SEO consultant based out of Gainesville, FL who specializes in link building. For more information on him and Point Blank SEO, visit the about page. Follow him on Twitter.

Relax - I send out free emails full of
cutting edge link building tips.
  1. I just can’t believe all the hype that guest blog gets and the number of people claiming it is dead. If you think about it, just about every link building method has been detested by Google so we can’t put much thought into their claims without testing.

    That being said, if a guest post on a high quality site with and editorial approval process is not a good link, we may all be in trouble as link builders.

    Great post and I love the tweet!

  2. Matt SEO says:

    Guest blogging and blogs that are just like article directories, low quality are dead. But guest blogging still works at least till now.

  3. Good article, thanks! It is not likely that Google will devalue the whole guest blogging thing. Probably it will devalue spammy blogs, poor quality posts, not-well structured blogs… But still Google is and will be appreciating flow of information and opinions.
    So, I think, it is just a shift for Google to more quality content. Otherwise, guest blogging is not dead.

  4. Frederik says:

    I opened up my blog for guest blogging months ago, as I was excited to have people helping out and writing good news articles. I wasn’t aware what I did back then…

    After about 5-10 articles, I started to realise that this is just spam and spam. By then, it was sort of too late and I found my site has been linked in lots of sites as a “site that accepts guest postings” a.k.a spammable site

    Sad, really. And I thought I could take a break every now and then and let my “readers” write 1 or 2 articles

  5. Percy says:

    Hey, indeed Matt Cutt’s latest intervention sent us all on a frenzy, but it’s not so grim.

    Just as the guy says, and I’m gonna quote him directly here”
    “There are still many good reasons to do some guest blogging (exposure, branding, increased reach, community, etc.). Those reasons existed way before Google and they’ll continue into the future. And there are absolutely some fantastic, high-quality guest bloggers out there. I changed the title of this post to make it more clear that I’m talking about guest blogging for search engine optimization (SEO) purposes.

    I’m also not talking about multi-author blogs. High-quality multi-author blogs like Boing Boing have been around since the beginning of the web, and they can be compelling, wonderful, and useful.”

    So that sums it up. If you’re writing relevant, good quality posts, keep doing that!

  6. loyd says:

    I’ve received some awful pitches for guest blogging from big drug companies and legal firms who are just trying to get their links where-ever they can – and when I dug further because they sounded fishy I was horrified to see how many people they duped.

    This is a good thing and hope it doesn’t affect the real deal guest posts! I like to be a guest and to have people guest post on my blog.

  7. loyd says:

    Guest blog can’t be ignored and One thing is pretty clear here… Google still heavily rely upon links in judging relevancy. But at this time SEO can’t play with their clients’ online business. They have to focus on content marketing that can earn link bait even if it is low budget domain.

  8. Marcus says:

    Hey Jon, great post.

    This is slightly off topic, but do you think there’s a risk that competitors could use spammy guest blogging techniques as a negative link building strategy to knock out their competitors?

    I’ve been worried about negative SEO for a while (seems easy for anyone to do), and this seems like the perfect time for competitors to attack.

  9. Why did I have to read this post before going to bed? I have been reading your blog for a while but never commented and I think now is the time I start. This post has me nervous about my sites and my livelihood online. Is any of this really possible?

  10. Nick says:

    I agree developing relationships with influencers is a much better approach than bluntly asking for a guest post. You need to be useful before you can ask an influencer to help you out. Simple things like sharing their content, commenting on their posts, and understanding their interests will help develop rapport. Although I must admit it can be hard as an agency to do those things, much much easier for an in-house marketer to go with this approach.

  11. Brown says:

    Great article,I’m wondering, aside from free content, what the benefits to accepting guest posts are.

    I blog for my company, and have recently considered accepting guest posts. I’m wondering, though, if that will ultimately create more headaches for me as I weed through the “good” and “bad” posts.

  12. Chris says:

    If you are guest posting for a third party, try to guest post for sites that are consistent with what that third party is doing. I get guest post offers with topics listed that aren’t even close to what I write about, that doesn’t benefit my readers or that third party.

  13. Dante says:

    A lot of people will take Matt Cutt’s statements as a black & white comment to say that they should no longer guest post AT ALL. But that is not what Google is saying. Guest posting is still alright as long as you continue to deliver high quality.

    I’ve started my own guest posting campaign to other bloggers within my niche and had great success. Why? Because the articles I’m using are ones that I would easily use on my own sites; not just some 350 word garbage someone got from oDesk.

  14. Michael says:

    I was really surprised to be censored on Matt Cutts’s blog. I posted a comment on his last post about guest blogging, believe me i was not agressive like some people can be sometimes, but i asked him a simple question.

    What he (Matt Cutts) or Google believe is better, a poor quality BUT ORGANIC guest blog or a Great Quality BUT NON ORGANIC guest blog ?

    I asked this question because Google is trying to make a confusion between the concept of quality and the concept of organic. Everything organic is not necessary quality, Google is fighting against “non organic”… not poor quality

  15. Lee says:

    Guest blogging has long been an effective tactic for building a community, a way of growing visibility for both your website and your byline, a means of driving traffic, increasing the exchange of ideas and a method of building inbound links to a website. Recently, Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Webspam team, released an article and a video about the decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO on his website that’s been widely discussed across the industry.

189 Flares Twitter 128 Facebook 0 Google+ 45 LinkedIn 16 189 Flares ×